Wine Wizard


Peter Wagner

Meridian is a large operation headquartered in St. Helena, CA, which is in the northern end of the Napa Valley. However, their major vineyards are in the Paso Robles area. Their wines tend to be blends from many regions. Their goal is approachable, affordable, straightforward wines and generally they have achieved that objective year after year, which is why I have chosen to focus this column on their current wines. Here goes:

2005 Meridian Chardonnay ($6). This has always been their flagship wine in my opinion, and this current vintage is no exception. It is the best of the six wines in this column, and tastes like a $20 or more effort. The nose is tropical (as usual for Meridian), with some nice citric tones to balance the ripe fruit aromas. The palate follows in kind - forward tropical fruit with lemon, almost sweet/sour sense (i.e., almost pineapple) with excellent but not biting acid. Mouthfeel is viscous but by no means buttery. The oak is there (vanilla) but what is especially nice is that the oak is not dominant. A good, quite long finish. This wine is tasty and fairly rich and appealing, but it is not very complex.

2005 Meridian Sauvignon Blanc ($6). This is NOT New Zealand style wine, so if you are hooked on NZ, forget it. This wine has nice melon and grapefruit aromas, and a palate that is similar. There is no oak. It is clean, dry, a bit generic, and has a short slightly bitter finish, at least until the wine warms up a bit towards room temperature. It is a fine party wine, but not of the quality of the above Chardonnay.

2005 Meridian Pinot Grigio ($6). This wine has a decent nose with notes of lemon, melon and, especially, nectarine. The palate is a bit different with fair but not opulent quince (similar to pear) leading lemon and nectarine flavors. There is a short, slightly hard finish. The overall impression is mediocre, but at this price, it’s worth a try if you like the variety or just want to see what California Pinot Grigio (aka Pinot Gris) is like.
2005 Meridian Pinot Noir ($11). Note the price - that’s what movies do to wine prices. The nose is “OK” but not interesting. You can tell it is Pinot by the cherry and spicy oak aromas. The sour cherry palate is a bit thin, and needs more fruit intensity. Tartness shows, along with spicy oak and some tobacco flavors. Mouthfeel is light and the wine is a bit thin. If only it had more cherry fruit. It does open a bit in the glass, but is still not that great. Surprisingly, the rest of the very same bottle when tasted at room temperature the next day after being in the frig 24 hours was quite a bit better, with more fruit and viscosity.

2004 Meridian Cabernet Sauvignon ($6). This is a strange wine. It is in a word very “berryish,” but I cannot identify the grape or what berry. Nose is cherry, slightly nutty and herbal. The palate is quite forward and rich, but the flavor is “berry”-unidentifiable to me. The fruit is very ripe, a bit spicy, with vanilla and slight tobacco. It has fair acidity, yet comes across as lush and almost sweet. The tannins are soft, and the length is reasonable. This wine was also as approachable the second day, but it all comes down to whether you like “berry” wine, lush and fruity as it may be. At this price, why not see if you like it?

2004 Meridian Merlot ($6). Not wholly dissimilar from the Cabernet above: again, “berryish”! There is cherry and vanilla on the nose with a bit of cashew nut. The palate is ripe and juicy berries” with a touch of spice, light tannin and medium acid. It has medium light body, and lacks any depth or complexity. It, too, lasted into the second day without deteriorating. A simple wine with generic flavors, but again, we all have different tastes and you may love it.

In sum, the Chardonnay is right on target, but the five other wines, while easy to drink, have flaws or odd features that will keep me continuing to look for the perfect bargain.

Additional wines:
Foxglove 2005 Edna Valley Chardonnay ($10). This is a light, refreshing, crisp wine, and is not heavy, over-oaked or buttery. Just the thing for warm summer evenings. By all means serve it a bit colder than usual. Nose and palate both are mainlycitrus and green apple with some tropical fruit as well. Acidity is very good, making it crisp and refreshing. Oak is in the background – touch of vanilla. Clean, balanced with good length, it is not the most complex or rich wine but a very good value in its style.

2-UP 2005 South Australian Shiraz ($9). This one will blow you away if you like your Oz Shiraz rich, tasty, balanced, soft and cheap. Bright plum and cherry nose with light vanilla oak. The palate is a rush of ripe, rich fruit (blueberry, cherry, plum), and the vanilla stays in the background as do the soft tannins. Acidity is excellent, giving the wine a brightness to balance the rich ripe fruit. Length is also very good. Dangerously easy to drink. Why the low price? It has limited structure and thus will probably last only a couple of years. But who cares?

Seghesio 2005 Sonoma Zinfandel ($16). This is the “bottom” of the Seghesio Zin range, yet in some ways tastes better than all the others at half the price. It has been reliable year after year, but 2005 is the best for some time in my book. This is a very, very good wine. Pure Zin raspberry/cherry and briar nose with some vanilla and a hint of tobacco. It does take about 15 minutes to open properly once poured into the glass, but worth the wait. The palate is pure, intense, ripe lush fruit that seems sweet at first, but is not (finishes quite dry) but there is good structure with excellent acid and medium tannins. It is full bodied, clean, and is actually elegant (by which I mean has lots of good stuff without the sense that every last element, such as tannins and bitter seed flavors, had to be squeezed out of the grapes to get decent fruit intensity). There is dill from the American oak, but the fruit leads the oak throughout. Very nice finish, there is nothing bad to say about this one. Except I don’t see how it could get better, so if you buy some, drink soon. But, don’t forget the 15 minutes to breathe in the glass after pouring.

Castle Rock 2005 central coast Pinot Noir ($9). Castle Rock pinot has become eagerly awaited each year since it first showed up a few years back – because it was always great value. The 2005 version lives up to its past. Very nice varietal black cherry fruit, not too much oak or spice, just a light presence that adds complexity. The wine is supple and viscous with medium light tannin and softer acids that makes the wine easy to drink. The finish is good, and overall I find this a much more attractive wine than the same-priced Mark West 2005 Pinot. Both are quite widely available, so why not try them side by side and decide for yourself? For $9 you don’t get a wine that will last too long, but well-stored I think this will go 4-5 years before breaking down.


[Index] [Why Funding Cuts at the National Institutes of Health Are So Painful] [Membership]
[APS News] [Education] [Mentoring Forum] [Science Policy] [Communications] [Positions Available]
[People & Places] [Senior Physiologists’ News]
[Scientific Meetings and Congresses] [APS Membership Application]