Introduction
The American Physiological Society (APS), the premier professional
organization representing physiologists, is devoted to fostering
education, scientific research, and dissemination of information in the
physiological sciences. It does this through a diverse array of high
quality scientific journals and other publications; its annual meeting,
Experimental Biology, conducted jointly with other FASEB members;
specialty conferences and meetings; awards and other incentive programs;
and ongoing education programs.
Founded in 1887 with 27 members, APS today has more than 10,500 members.
The Society is governed by an elected Council consisting of the President,
President-elect, and Past President, plus nine Councilors. APS also offers
members affiliation with a variety of sections and interest groups,
created to bring members together around areas of common interest. An
active committee structure addresses specific topics of importance to
members. Headquartered in Bethesda, MD, on the campus of the Federation of
American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB), APS employs
approximately 70 staff.
Strategic planning is crucial for APS in today’s complex and changing
environment. Among the many factors influencing APS today are decreased
overall financial support for research and the changing definition of
physiology. In addition, there is a diminished emphasis on science
education, and concern that the “pipeline” of future scientists—and in
particular women and minorities—is not as robust as desired. Open access
and the evolving information environment are having major impacts on
scientific publishing, one of the Society’s major strengths. And a
changing political environment, including a perceived “anti-science”
trend, is influencing funding and support for research.
As it addresses this challenging and changing environment, APS has the
opportunity to build on its assets, particularly its publications,
meetings, and educational programs. Its financial and organizational
resources, history, and respect position it to move forward with strength.
At the same time, APS recognizes the need to address its dependence on
publications revenue and the changing publishing models. It also is
committed to addressing the diversity of science within physiology and to
ensuring that its organization and governance reflect the
interdisciplinary nature of the science and are attractive to those
entering the field.
The Planning Process
APS has previously developed and implemented strategic plans, most
recently in 2000. These plans have provided guidance to the Society and
helped shape its operations. As APS fulfilled its existing plan and the
external and internal environments changed, the Council determined that it
was time to develop a new strategic plan to guide the Society for the next
several years.
The focal point of the process was a strategic planning retreat held in
Houston, Texas, from October 29-31, 2005. Participants included the
Council, Section Representatives, members of the Long Range Planning
Committee, members of the Trainee Advisory Committee, Chairs of major APS
committees, and senior staff. Over the course of the retreat, the group
discussed APS’s current situation, including its strengths and weaknesses
and significant environmental trends; evaluated and refocused its mission;
agreed on strategic directions for the future; identified preliminary
strategies and outcomes; and discussed the organization and governance
implications of the plan. A list of retreat attendees is included in the
Appendix.
Following a review of the initial draft, the Council and senior staff met
again February 22-24, 2006 to further refine the plan and discuss specific
actions that might be undertaken to implement it. This document integrates
the results of that meeting into the plan.
Cambridge Concord Associates provided strategic planning consultation
throughout the process; consultants included CCA principals Jane Fisher
and Elaine Kuttner, and CCA Associate Paul Kuttner.
Mission of the American Physiological Society (APS)
APS promotes discovery, disseminates knowledge, and advances education in
physiology.
In addition, APS will continue to use the tag line: "Integrating the life
sciences from molecule to organism"
Definition of Physiology
A working definition of physiology was proposed to help communicate the
discipline and provide a common basis for understanding:
Physiology is the study of the function of organisms as integrated systems
of molecules, cells, tissues, and organs, in health and disease.
Overarching Goal of the
Strategic Plan
The overarching goal of the strategic plan is to position physiology as a
central and critical biomedical discipline and strengthen its
relationships with the other life sciences.
Achieving this goal will require strategic focus in advancing
physiological science, supporting new scientists, increasing understanding
and support of physiology, ensuring relevance to a diverse membership, and
having adequate and appropriate organizational resources.
Achieving this goal is of critical importance to the future of physiology
and the future of APS. The strategic directions that follow are all aimed
at this repositioning of physiology at the center of biomedicine. Some of
the outcomes that would indicate success in achieving this goal include:
-
Maintaining physiology as a separate
discipline and/or department in medical schools
-
Increased participation of APS members on NIH study sections
-
Increased recognition by other organizations:
-
Increased representation of physiologists on National Board test
committees
-
Increased nominations for National Academies of Science
-
Increased interaction with Liaison Committee
for Medical Education and Association of Chairs of Departments of
Physiology on issues relevant to physiology.
Strategic Directions,
Strategies, and Potential Actions
Direction 1: APS will be the leader in advancing the life sciences that
investigate biological function.
Rationale: As the life sciences evolve and the field expands to include
systems biology and other new and emerging disciplines, there is a need to
ensure that physiology is appropriately positioned and its central role
understood. Biological function—of molecules, cells, and organisms—is at
the heart of physiology and this knowledge is critical to the broader life
sciences.
As the premier society representing physiology and physiologists, APS is
well positioned to provide leadership to the evolving life sciences.
Building on the strengths of its programs and its long history, APS can
embrace new and emerging disciplines and be a leader in redefining and
advancing the field, partnering with related societies when appropriate.
APS journals and meetings are the principal ways in which the Society
provides leadership in advancing the life sciences that investigate
biological function. This direction has at its core the desire to make the
journals and meetings the first choice for the dissemination of knowledge
in physiology.
Success in advancing the field is also dependent on APS’s continued
ability to attract and retain members who represent the breadth and depth
of the field, including emerging areas that are important for the future.
Society offerings must be flexible and diverse enough to meet the needs of
all who are involved in the life sciences that investigate biological
function, from trainees to senior professionals.
Direction 1: Strategy 1: Build on the strength of APS journals and
leverage them to have the greatest impact in the scientific community.
- Make APS journals the first choice journals by increasing the
selectivity of content.
- Broaden the scope of APS journals by increasing the proportion of
interdisciplinary articles.
- Engage the editorial boards to be advocates for the journals.
- Promote the idea that APS journals are the best journals for members,
striving to increase the journals’ impact factors and citations for our
authors.
Direction 1: Strategy 2: Redesign APS meetings and conferences to enhance
quality, participation, and recognition.
- Broaden programs to include related disciplines such as systems biology
and integrative and quantitative sciences.
- Increase cross-sectional, cross-societal, and cross-disciplinary
programming at EB.
- Add a true plenary opening session for APS at the EB meeting with a high
profile speaker and recognition of accomplishments and volunteers.
- Develop a strategy to increase international participation and
presentation at EB and other APS meetings.
- Increase utilization of the word “physiology” in promoting EB and other
APS conferences.
- Establish a new committee to assess and strengthen APS conferences and
small meetings to better serve diverse audiences and to increase
recognition of physiology.
Direction 1: Strategy 3: Develop a strategic approach to partnerships to
benefit the Society and its goals and help broaden APS’s reach and
audiences.
- Define criteria for the creation of partnerships with other societies
and a means to evaluate their success.
- Increase APS’s visibility with other specialty societies, including
developing bi-directional or joint meetings with other groups related to
physiology.
Direction 1: Strategy 4: Create a worldwide technological resource for
physiology knowledge and collaboration.
- Invest in the web site to create a dynamic resource that will draw
people from around the world into the Society.
- Create an interactive
knowledge environment/community that will support
collaboration across physiology.
Direction 2 APS will enhance the future of the field, ensuring that next
generation physiologists are supported through all stages of their
careers.
Rationale: The field of physiology will thrive only if it can continue to
attract and retain top quality trainees and young professionals. APS is
well positioned to be a leader in promoting and supporting careers in
physiology. To do this, it will need to help attract more high quality,
diverse researchers to the field; influence education and training at all
levels; and provide encouragement and support for trainees and early
career professionals.
APS sees its education role broadly, from ongoing professional education
to K-12 programs. Building awareness of the field among potential
scientists and sustaining interest in physiology are two major challenges
that APS must address as it moves forward.
Efforts to build the pipeline may be enhanced by local outreach and
involvement. Expanding the number and role of APS chapters might enhance
the Society’s ability to connect with students at all levels, from K-12
through graduate school.
Over time, the goal is to see increased numbers of students in graduate
programs, as well as increases in undergraduate physiology education,
evidenced by more courses and curricula. In addition, success in moving in
this direction should bring increases in APS membership and participation
by students and early career physiologists, as well as a rising proportion
of student members who convert to regular members.
Direction 2: Strategy 1: Support trainees and early career physiologists
in career development and transitions to help them become successful and
competitive physiologists.
- Enhance award programs to ensure that they provide opportunities for
physiologists at all levels.
- Develop awards based on authorship.
- Advocate for increased graduate student and postdoctoral stipends and
benefits.
- Strengthen professional skills programs online, including on the web,
through podcasts and webinars, making information available 24/7.
- Identify and promote traditional and non-traditional career tracks to
appeal to a broad range of scientists and educators.
- Enhance mentoring programs for trainees and early career physiologists.
Involve faculty in physiology departments with APS programs, committees,
chapters, and other leadership groups and work with them to support and
engage trainees.
- Encourage participation of trainees in APS committees, sections,
chapters, and other leadership positions, and consider representation of
the Trainee Advisory Committee on Council.
Direction 2: Strategy 2: Increase the visibility and presence of
physiology in undergraduate education.
- Encourage and support the creation of undergraduate physiology courses
and ways to build physiology into undergraduate curriculum so that
students understand the field and its potential.
- Take advantage of newly developed health career programs; find ways to
partner with these programs to incorporate physiology into their content.
- Develop ways to engage students in physiology research early in their
education, including strengthening undergraduate summer research programs.
- Target undergraduate faculty as partners in developing the physiology
pipeline.
- Build awareness of career opportunities in physiology.
- Provide incentives for undergraduates to attend EB.
Direction 2: Strategy 3: Continue to develop and expand K-12 outreach by
strengthening member involvement in K-12 education and supporting high
school teachers.
- Continue support of existing programs.
- Consider increasing chapter support and activities to develop local
resources to participate in K-12 programs.
- Develop web-based
programs and other technological tools (animation,
computer games, etc.) to facilitate understanding of
physiology and to reach young audiences.
Direction 3: APS will drive understanding of and appreciation for
physiology and strengthen public and private support.
Rationale: Closely related to Direction 1, Direction 3 focuses on the need
to ensure a broad understanding of and appreciation for physiology and the
work of physiologists. Public and private support includes both financial
support and policy support around such issues as the use of animals in
research. APS’s advocacy efforts, both on its own and in partnership with
FASEB and others, are key to success in this area and must be continued
and strengthened.
A principal desired outcome for this direction is that physiology be
recognized for its key role in biomedical research. In recent years
physiology has gone from being at the center of biomedical research to
being on the periphery; a recent major NIH RFA on translational medicine
did not acknowledge the role of physiology in clinical medicine, and there
is no longer a physiology study section. In the post-genomic era,
physiology, as the study of function, is more important than ever, but,
possibly because of the increased importance, some aspects of physiology
are being co-opted, contributing to an erosion of funds and support for
the discipline. This direction is aimed at building recognition of the
important role of physiology in biomedicine by enhancing advocacy and
outreach efforts.
Other specific desired outcomes include a reduction in legislation that
impedes the use of animals in research and educational settings, and
increased media coverage of new physiological research from EB and other
APS meetings and journals.
Concurrent with its advocacy efforts, APS will focus on building public
awareness of the importance of physiology research, since awareness is so
closely linked to government support. These efforts include school-based
programs as well as new web-based approaches and collaborations. Ties with
industry provide another means of building awareness and support and
should be further developed. Finally, as noted in Direction 1, APS has the
opportunity—and the obligation—to promote the value of physiology among
other scientific disciplines and ensure its continued strength in the
broad life sciences.
Direction 3: Strategy 1: Improve the effectiveness of APS advocacy for
public policy and funding in support of physiological research.
- Increase APS advocacy efforts, with an emphasis on more active
involvement of Council and members on Capitol Hill.
- Develop and promote position papers on important issues such as the role
of physiology in biomedical research or the importance of physiology in
medical school curriculum.
- Continue to work with FASEB to leverage APS’s own advocacy capacity:
- Strengthen APS’s representation in FASEB to ensure that the Society is
best able to leverage this resource; assess the best way to provide for
APS representation on the FASEB Board.
- Consider working with FASEB to develop a PAC in support of research
policy.
- Pursue other appropriate partners, using the “DC Principles” model, to
help advance APS’s advocacy agenda:
- Partner with clinical societies and patient groups to emphasize the
impact of funding cuts in research and eventually on health care.
- Partner with groups such as the American Heart Association, the American
Thoracic Society, and other disease-specific groups to lobby with them on
common issues.
- Develop chapter programs in support of public affairs issues in local
regions.
- Make the Chair of the APS Public Affairs Committee an ex-officio member
of Council.
Direction 3: Strategy 2: Increase participation and representation of APS
members at all levels of decision making at NIH and other funding
agencies.
- Develop a focused program for NIH advocacy.
- Identify groups that are drafting RFAs and ensure that there is
appropriate input of physiologists into the process.
Direction 3: Strategy 3: Strengthen and expand existing programs, and
create new approaches to enhance public awareness of the physiological
sciences.
- Implement “Physiology Understanding Week.”
- Increase and enhance the Society’s web presence, with an emphasis on
user-friendly information about physiology.
- Continue to support and expand K-12 education programs (see Direction
2).
- Devise novel outreach materials such as games or contests for
downloadable presentations by physiologists about their research, labs,
etc.
- Align APS with groups such as the National Network of Health Libraries
and provide them with quality materials on physiology.
Direction 3: Strategy 4: Build alliances with government, industry, and
clinical sciences to promote research and education and develop policy in
the physiological sciences.
- Promote the value of physiology to other scientific disciplines by
improving the quality of science at EB and sponsoring sessions at meetings
of other disciplines.
- Work with other scientific and clinical societies to advocate for
supportive research policies and increased funding for biomedical
research.
- Consider establishing a Task Force with industry representation to
develop ways to promote research and education.
Direction 4: APS will be dynamic and relevant to an increasingly diverse
and global membership.
Rationale: As science becomes truly international and barriers between and
among nations are reduced, APS is becoming a more global society. At the
same time, its traditional US membership is becoming more diverse, in both
its research interests and its demographics. APS’s continued strength
depends on its ability to meet the evolving needs of its members and
potential members, which will require that its membership programs and
policies actively encourage a broad range of constituencies.
Constituencies include those based on science, geography, career track
(research, education, industry), career stage, demographics, etc.
Research to determine member needs, followed by programs that provide
value to targeted constituencies, will be important moving forward. New
technology offers possibilities for reaching out to new audiences and
enhancing the benefits APS can provide. This direction should lead to an
increase in new products and services aimed at a more diverse APS
membership, as well as growing diversity in membership and enhanced
participation in APS meetings and conferences.
Success in accomplishing this direction will result in a more engaged and
expanded membership, both in the US and globally. Over time, there should
be measurable changes in membership demographics such as racial diversity,
average age, gender, and career stage. It is also expected that efforts to
increase minority participation in the Society—and evaluation of the
success of these efforts—will lead to increased diversity in APS
leadership.
Direction 4: Strategy 1: Strengthen programs to recruit, retain, and fully
engage underrepresented minorities and women in physiology and in APS.
- Instruct all programs to address diversity proactively.
- Develop programs to attract minority students to the field of physiology
and to support their career development.
- Develop programs to promote career development for women in physiology.
- Evaluate the success of programs, committees, sections, and other APS
entities in addressing the Society’s diversity goals.
Direction 4: Strategy 2: Develop the capacity to regularly assess the
needs of APS’s diverse members and potential members.
- Establish ongoing surveys and other tools to stay in touch with members
and determine their changing needs.
- Regularly conduct focus groups with potential members to explain what
physiology is and what the Society can offer them.
- Carry out spot surveys of potential members in related disciplines to
determine what might attract them to APS.
Direction 4: Strategy 3: Utilize new technologies to enhance the appeal
of, and access to, scientific meetings, publications, and programs for
diverse members.
- Develop web-based courses available 24/7 for people who cannot attend
face-to-face meetings or who prefer this form of education.
- Continue to enhance the APS web site to meet the diverse needs of
members, potential members, and scientific colleagues.
Direction 4: Strategy 4: Broaden APS
membership to embrace a wider variety of constituencies in the life
sciences, creating new membership categories if needed.
- Create a new membership category for undergraduate students, focusing on
providing them with information through web access, electronic
communications, Podcasts, and webinars.
- Create new membership categories for allied health professionals such as
nurses, physical therapists, nutritionists, and others.
- Consider a form of membership for high school students and teachers.
-
Promote chapters within the US as
vehicles for membership development.
Direction 4: Strategy 5: Develop a global discourse on physiology and
support international members.
- Partner with other national societies to promote the physiological
sciences.
- Increase emphasis on the web for international communications, including
such offerings as teaching symposia at EB.
- Create country-specific APS member listservs to facilitate communication
among physiologists.
- Develop a plan to increase international membership and enhance the
participation of international members on significant committees and in APS leadership.
Direction 5: APS will be a mission-directed, adaptable, and fiscally sound
organization.
Rationale: As publications models change, APS will need to continue to
adapt its business model and determine the best ways in which to diversify
its income streams to ensure a smooth transition. Ensuring appropriate
diversification of income, as well as continued wise use of resources,
will be essential as APS moves forward.
Organizational adaptability will also be important. APS’s organization and
governance have served it well, providing strong and experienced
leadership for the Society and contributing to its success. However, the
combination of a new and ambitious strategic plan, the growing diversity
of members, and changes in the publications business model, make it an
opportune time to look at APS’s organization and governance and determine
if new approaches might be more effective moving forward.
Some of the topics to consider include the role of the Council, the
structure and roles of the sections, and the number, role, and composition
of committees.
Direction 5: Strategy 1: Explore ways to diversify APS revenue sources,
including adapting the publications model to respond to changes in the
publishing and research environments.
- Consider hiring a development officer to raise funds for the Society’s
various award programs and activities.
- Identify ways to utilize the Society’s web presence and offerings to
develop a revenue stream for the Society.
- Develop a plan to transition from a subscription based publishing model
to an author pays model as required by the marketplace.
Direction 5: Strategy 2: Assess the APS governance model and approaches to
ensure that the APS continues to be responsive to external trends, is able
to adapt to changing needs, and does support the strategic plan.
- Review the composition and role of Council and revise as necessary to
meet current requirements.
- Review the roles and structure of Sections to ensure that they support
the evolution of the field and the diverse interests of members and
prospective members.
- Review the roles and composition of committees and determine whether any
new or changed committees are needed to implement the strategic plan.
- Develop a plan to increase the diversity and breadth of committee
membership, including ways to involve trainees and next generation
professionals.
- Consider broadening the charge to the Public Affairs Committee by making
the Committee the focal point for discussions of all public policy issues
of concern to the Society.
- Strengthen participation and engagement in APS through a focused
leadership development program.
|
October 2005 Strategic Plan
Meeting Participants |
Council
Douglas C. Eaton, President
D. Neil Granger, Past
President
Dale J. Benos, President-Elect
Susan M. Barman, Councillor
Irving G. Joshua, Councillor
Carole M. Liedtke, Councillor
Thomas E. Lohmeier, Councillor
Helen E. Raybould, Councillor
Jeff M. Sands, Councillor
Gary C. Sieck, Councillor
Irving H. Zucker, Councillor
Robert G. Carroll, Educ. Comm.
Chair
Peter D. Wagner, Finance Comm.
Chair
Curt D. Sigmund, JPC Chair
Kim E. Barrett, Publications
Comm. Chair
Kenneth Baldwin, SAC Chair
Barbara Horwitz, Past
President
John Williams, Past President
Virginia Miller, Past member
of Council
Charles Tipton, Past member of
Council
Section Representatives
Gerald Meininger, Rep., CV
Section
Simon Lewis, Chair, Cell &
Molecular
William Martin, Chair, CNS
Section
James Hicks, Chair,
Comparative Physiology
Ronald Terjung, Chair, EEP
Section
Alan Sved, Chair, NCAR
Pamela Carmines, Chair, Renal
Section
Susan Gunst, Chair,
Respiration Section
Francis Belloni, Chair,
Teaching Section
Joey Granger, Chair, WEH
Section
Long Range Planning
Committee
L. Gabriel Navar, Chair
David Brooks
Heather Drummond
Catherine Fuller
Bruce Lindsey
Paul Welling
|
Trainee Advisory Committee
Caroline Sussman, Chair
Milton Hamblin
Angela Grippo
Sean Stocker
Rudy Ortiz
APS Committee
Representatives
William Talman, Chair, Public
Affairs
Kevin Kregel, Chair, Animal
Care & Experimentation
Hannah Carey, Chair,
Communications
Peter Friedman, Chair, Awards
William Galey, Chair, Career
Opportunities
Patricia Molina, Chair,
International Physiology
Chahrzad Montrose, Chair,
Liaison w/ Industry
Lisa Harrison-Bernard, Chair,
Membership
Gregory Florant, Chair, Porter
Physiol. Develop.
APS Staff
Martin Frank, Executive
Director
Robert Price, Director of
Finance
Margaret Reich, Director of
Publications
Marsha Matyas, Director of
Education Programs
Linda Allen, Manager, Meetings
& Membership
Alice Ra’anan, Public Affairs
Officer
Sue Sabur, Marketing Manager
Mayer Resnick, Communications
Officer
Linda Dresser, Executive
Assistant
Cambridge Concord
Associates
(Planning consultants)
Jane Fisher
Elaine Kuttner
Paul Kuttner |
|