Porter Program History and Purpose
The American Physiological Society (APS) has been continuously
involved in the support of career training of physiologists since the award
of the first Porter Fellowship in 1920. The Fellowship was first established
and maintained by Dr. William Townsend Porter through his personal
generosity and that of the non-profit Harvard Apparatus Company, founded by
Porter (1). Porter recognized the need to stimulate and recruit young
scientists as career teachers and investigators. He later included in his
legacy a means for perpetuation of the annually awarded Fellowship through
the William Townsend Porter Foundation (formerly the Harvard Apparatus
Foundation). Fellows were selected each year by a panel made up of APS
members.
The current goal of the Porter Physiology Fellowship Program is to encourage
diversity among students pursuing full-time studies toward the PhD in the
physiological sciences and to encourage their participation in the APS.
Fellowships are open to underrepresented ethnic minority applicants who are
citizens or permanent residents of the United States or its territories
(African Americans, Hispanics, Native Americans, Native Alaskans, or Native
Pacific Islanders) and who have been accepted into or are currently enrolled
in a graduate program in physiology. Fellowships are one-year awards, but,
based on trainee progress, a second year of support is frequently awarded.
Between 1967 and 2001, Fellowships were awarded to 73 students. More than
two-thirds (67%) of the Fellows have been African-American students (n=49),
and 29% were Hispanic students (n=21). Very few Native American (1%, n=1) or
Pacific-Islander (3%, n=2) students received Porter Fellowships, and
applications from these two groups have been very rare. In 2000, with
support from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney
Diseases (NIDDK), the APS began a retrospective study to determine the
impact of both the Porter Physiology Development Program and the NIDDK
Minority Travel Fellows Program. Selected results from that study are
presented here; the full study is forthcoming in March 2004.
Survey Methodology
A brief survey questionnaire was developed to gather information on the
career path of past Porter Fellows and on their perceptions of the impact
their Fellowships had on their careers. The survey included multiple-choice,
short-answer, and open-ended questions. The survey process utilized several
methods proven to increase overall mailed survey response rates (2),
including multiple mailings. The anticipated response rate for surveys using
these methods is approximately 60% (1). Ultimately, surveys were completed
and returned by 43 Fellows for an overall response rate of 59% of all past
Porter Fellows (n=73) and 66% of those for whom addresses could be found
(n=65). These percentages compare favorably with the expected response rate
noted above. Additional data for non-respondents were extracted, where
possible, from information found on the APS membership database, other
society membership databases, and employers’ websites. This brought the
overall number of past Porter Fellows for whom some data were available to
57 (70%).
Results
Current Status of Past Porter Fellows
At the time of the survey, more than half (52%) of the past Porter Fellows
were employed physiologists (Table 1). An additional 14% (n=10) were
postdoctoral students, and 11% (n=8) were graduate students. The current
status of the remaining 16 past Fellows could not be determined. The large
majority (87%) of the Porter Fellows had either already completed or were in
the process of completing studies leading to a doctoral (PhD) degree. Only
one Porter Fellow could be identified as having not completed the doctoral
degree. In addition to PhD degrees in physiology, several Fellows earned
additional degrees, including an MBA, a Bachelor’s degree in another field,
a PhD in Biophysics, and MD/PhDs (n=3).
Table
1. Status of Past Porter Fellows at Time
of the Survey. |
| Status at Time of
Survey |
Frequency |
Percent |
| Graduate Students |
8 |
11 |
| Postdoctoral Fellows |
10 |
14 |
| Employed Physiologists |
38 |
52 |
| Unknown Status |
16 |
22 |
| Deceased |
1 |
1 |
The remainder of this article focuses on the career paths of past Porter
Fellows who have completed their training. Information on the career paths
and training of past Fellows who were still students (graduate and
postdoctoral) at the time of the survey is available in the full study
report, forthcoming in March 2004.
The career paths of past Fellows (n=38) who were employed physiologists at
the time of the survey were examined in greater detail, to gain a better
understanding of where they were in terms of career development and
participation in the physiology community. Initially, the large majority
(88%) of employed Fellows completed a postdoctoral fellowship before
beginning their first professional position. Most Fellows held a single
postdoctoral position (69%) while smaller percentages held two (12%) or
three (8%) positions.
Respondents were asked to describe their first professional position (Table
2). About two-thirds of responding past Fellows (65%) held first
professional positions as assistant professors in medical schools or
universities.
|
Table
2. First Professional Position of Employed Fellows |
| Position Title |
Number |
Percentage of
Respondents* |
Assistant Professor, university+
Assistant Professor, medical school
Research Assistant Professor
Research Physiologist
in government or private industry
Research Instructor
Clinician
Government Funding Program Director
Manager, Technology licensing for medical school
No response |
8
7
2
2
1
1
1
1
15 |
35
30
9
9
4
4
4
4
------ |
*Sum may not total 100% due to rounding.
+Includes one Fellow who indicated that the Assistant Professorship was non-tenure
track. |
When asked about their current position, the large majority of past Fellows
indicated that they were employed by academic institutions (77%) (Table 3).
Nearly half were in faculty positions, primarily in physiology or life
sciences departments. Smaller percentages were in clinical (5%) or
administrative (8%) positions. Less than 20% described their position as
research assistant, lab assistant, or instructor. A number of Fellows were
working in government positions, primarily as administrators of research
programs, including an NIH Deputy Director and an Institute Director.
Only 10% of the past Fellows were identified as holding positions in
industry. It should be noted that this may be an underestimate, since some
information was gathered via web searches and it is harder to identify and
locate scientists employed in industry via web searches than either those in
academia or government. Unlike researchers in academia or government,
industry scientists
are unlikely to have individual web pages describing
their research or work and most industries do not publish employee titles
and contact information online.
| Table
3. Current Professional Position of Employed Fellows |
| Position Title |
Number |
%* |
%* |
Faculty Positions
Associate Professor (6)
Assistant Professor (4)
Professor (5)
Faculty position-title unspecified (2)
Clinical Positions
Clinical Assistant Professor (1)
Chief Resident Neurosurgery (1)
Other Academic Research & Teaching Positions
Research Assistant Professor (3)
Research Associate (1)
Lab Assistant (1)
Research Instructor (1)
Director, Multi-discipline Teaching Laboratory (1)
Administrative Positions
Associate Dean (1)
Associate Provost (1)
Associate VP for Sponsored Research (1)
Industrial Positions
Biological Systems Scientist (1)
Senior Manager, Biomedical Licensing (1)
Industry position-title unspecified (2)
Government Positions
Government Office Directors (3)
Deputy Director, NIH Div. of Extramural Activities (1)
Director, NIH Institute (1) |
17
2
7
3
4
5
|
45
5
18
8
10
13 |
|
Finally, respondents indicated how their work time is allocated (Table 4).
On average, the employed past Fellows spent just under half of their work
time engaged in research with the other half of their time divided between
teaching and management/administration. This varied with specific job title,
of course, with some Fellows (n=5) indicating that they spent 100% of their
time in management or administrative tasks. Few Fellows (n=5) spent more
than half of their time in teaching and only two Fellows indicated that they
engaged in patient care activities. Three Fellows indicated that they spend
a portion of their time on committee work.
In summary, the past Porter Fellows who have completed their training are,
in general, working in physiology-related positions commensurate with their
doctoral training. They are found not only in academic positions in medical
schools and universities, but also in industry and government positions. A
number of the past Fellows hold significant positions as department chairs,
senior managers in industry, or department/division heads in government
agencies. Most of the past Fellows spent a significant portion of their time
engaged in biomedical research and spend at least a portion of their time in
teaching, management, and administration. Few of the past Fellows are
engaged in patient care or clinical research as a physician.
| Table 4. Current Allocation of Time to Key Work Activities |
| Key Work Activity |
Employed
Physiologists |
|
Mean % of
time |
Median %
of time |
Min/Max |
Research
Teaching
Management/Administration
Patient Care
Other “Committee Service” |
47.4
28.8
26.9
6.7
1.5 |
45
10
10
0
0 |
0/100%
0/95%
0/100%
0/80%
0/15% |
Porter Fellows and APS Membership
One of the goals of the Porter Physiology Development Program is to
encourage participation of Fellows in the APS. As shown in Table 5, the
large majority of graduate students and postdoctoral fellows in the program
are student or regular members of the Society. More than 40% of the employed
physiologists were regular members at the time of the survey. Among the
employed physiologists, 34% also indicated that they had been student
members of the APS during their training. Of those who were student members
during their training, 62% are now active members in the APS. At the time of
the survey, 29 of the 72 past Fellows (40%) were active regular or student
members.
| Table 5. Membership Status of Past Fellows by Career Level |
| Membership Status |
Graduate Students |
Postdoctoral Fellows |
Employed Physiologists |
Regular Member
Student Member
Non-member |
-------
75%
25% |
40%
30%
30% |
42%
-------
58% |
Past Porter Fellows have also made significant contributions to the APS
through service on APS committees, sections, and task forces. They have
played key roles in APS education programs such as the NIDDK Minority Travel
Fellowships by serving as role models and mentors for minority students
attending the APS annual meeting and fall conferences. Similarly, a number
of past Porter Fellows have served as Physiologists-in-Residence for the APS
Frontiers in Physiology Summer Research Program for middle and high school
science teachers.
Impacts of the Fellowship
The impacts of the Porter Fellowship cannot be assessed simply by numbers of
degrees, titles, and institutional descriptions. Graduate and postdoctoral
fellowships have important impacts on trainees in terms of not only
financial status, but perseverance to degree completion, self-image, and
perceptions of others. The retrospective study of past Porter Fellows also
explored their perceptions of how the Fellowship impacted their training,
professional development, and self-image.
Fellows first were asked whether they felt that the Porter Fellowship had an
impact on the quality of their training as biomedical researchers. Many
respondents indicated that the Fellowship provided them with the freedom to
make important professional choices. Because they had an independent
fellowship they felt they could select a graduate advisor or postdoctoral
position based on their own research interests, not on the availability of
funds in the advisor’s laboratory group. One Fellow stated:
The Porter Fellowship allowed me to choose the university, the major
advisor—with or without funds—and my specific research area. Otherwise, I
would have chosen a professor with funds whether or not I liked their
research area.
A number of Fellows indicated that having a Fellowship allowed them to focus
fully on their research work, contributing to the quality of their work and
training. Comments included the following:
The Fellowship allowed me to concentrate on my research and resulted in a
higher quality PhD dissertation. As a result, my entire dissertation was
published in quality peer-reviewed journals. This certainly helped me get a
postdoctoral fellowship.
Academically, the Porter Fellowship has allowed me to be a stronger and more
focused researcher as the financial assistance afforded me time to
concentrate 100% on research and my development as a researcher.
Fellows also commented on the Fellowships’ impacts on their career
commitment. They noted the positive impacts the Fellowship had on their
financial security during their graduate studies and on their
self-confidence as a researcher:
It gave me more confidence in my ideas and career path. Science is often
negative and critical and support (financial and emotional) are greatly
needed and appreciated during graduate school.
The Fellowship was pivotal in my career. It offered the opportunity of doing
a post-doc in a new area of research, Developmental Neurobiology, which
became my principal research interest. I cannot imagine becoming a
successful investigator without the training opportunity this Fellowship offered
me.
Receiving the Porter Fellowship made my self-confidence as a researcher
improve. I…was very thankful to receive the Porter Fellowship during my
pre-doctoral training. It was a very significant honor for me.
The Porter Fellowship was available to me at a time when financial
difficulties made it strenuous to maintain my commitment to biomedical
research. In this regard, Porter was instrumental in helping me maintain
focus throughout the graduate school experience.
This prestigious award played a critical role in defining my career path as
a Physiologist, both as a teacher and a researcher. It increased my
commitment and devotion to the physiological sciences because I became part
of a selected and highly distinguished group of scientists that defined the
knowledge and direction of what constitutes physiology today.
Fellows were invited to add additional comments about the overall impact of
the Fellowship—both positive and negative. Their comments indicate that the
Fellowship, in many cases, provided important support and recognition at
critical junctures in their career development:
This Fellowship has helped me tremendously, economic and academically. I
have been able to work long hours on my research project, and not to worry
about part-time jobs. Also, being part of the Porter Physiology Fellowship
[program] assured me of the relevance of my research topic.
This Fellowship gave me the opportunity to pursue my graduate studies full
time. As a single [parent] at the time, this really helped me out!
The Porter Fellowship is a wonderful program for graduating doctoral
students to develop their grant writing “muscles” and develop independent
research.
As a PhD candidate I have gained more support and recognition from my
institution after receiving the Fellowship.
My colleagues consider the Porter Physiology Fellowship a prestigious award;
therefore, it has helped my C.V.
When asked for final comments about the program, Fellows wholeheartedly
encouraged the continuation of the program. As one Fellow said:
A superb model that should be emulated. One the country should be using in
other areas of science and engineering.
Recent Program Enhancements
Fellows were asked for suggestions for enhancing or improving the Fellowship
program. A number of their suggestions echoed the enhancements already being
made to the Porter Fellowships and other APS minority programs, including
the following:
- Since 2002, an annual reception for all current and past Porter Fellows
and NIDDK Travel Fellows has been held at the Experimental Biology meetings;
- In 2003, the APS Education Office launched the APS Minority Physiologist
Listserv. In addition to offering easy communication among minority
physiology students, the Education Office sends a bi-weekly email with
information on awards, Fellowships, grant opportunities, and postdoctoral
and professional positions available;
- Publicity for the Fellowship has been expanded via Internet and listserv
announcements to numerous organizations and via exhibits at the annual
meeting of the Society for the Advancement of Chicanos and Native Americans
in Science (SACNAS) and the NIH-sponsored Annual Biomedical Research
Conference for Minority Students (ABRCMS). As a result, in recent years
applications to the Porter Fellowship have increased significantly;
- The Fellowship stipend has been increased to be commensurate with NIH
stipends; and
- As part of the new APS Careers in Physiology website
(http://www.the-aps.org/careers/careers1/index.htm),
special resource pages for minority students and physiologists have been
added at each educational level.
Summary
The Porter Physiology Development Program Fellowships have supported the
predoctoral and postdoctoral studies of numerous minority students. All of
the Fellows responding to the current survey continue to be involved in life
sciences-related work, primarily as physiologists-in-training or as
physiologists working in academia, government, or industry. Following
receipt of their degree, the large majority of Fellows completed a single
postdoctoral fellowship and entered their first professional position. Most
employed past-Fellows spent at least part of their time engaged in research
and were also involved in teaching, management, and administration.
Respondents felt strongly that the Porter Fellowship had contributed to the
quality of their pre/postdoctoral training. They felt it gave them
intellectual freedom to select research advisors and topics or postdoctoral
positions. They also felt the financial freedom provided by the Fellowship
allowed them to concentrate on their research, contributing both to the
quality of their work and to their overall career commitment. Fellows
strongly recommended continuation of the program and offered suggestions for
expansion and increased communication.
Finally, one of the most powerful benefits of the program is in its
longitudinal impact. Past Fellows now serve as role models for a new
generation of minority students aspiring to careers in biomedical research.
Some have their own graduate students who have received the Porter
Fellowship. One such Fellow emphasized the importance of this aspect of the
program:
I was always told by my colleagues that I would be a good role model to
minority students. Having Fellowships like the Porter Development Fellowship
insures the training of minority professionals. Young minority students have
hope of becoming scientists when they see those of us who have made it. I
have graduate students who tell me that they want a laboratory and to do
research like I am doing which makes me feel that I have accomplished
something [important].
As stated earlier, the goal of the Porter Physiology Fellowship Program is
to encourage diversity among students pursuing full-time studies toward the
PhD (or DSc) in the physiological sciences, and to encourage their
participation in the APS. The findings of this retrospective study suggest
that the program has been highly successful in both of these aspects.
References
1. Brobeck, J.R., Reynolds, O.E., & Appel, T. History of the American
Physiological Society: The First Century, 1887-1987. Bethesda, MD: American
Physiological Society, 1987.
2. Miller, D.C. Handbook of Research Design and Social Measurement (5th
Edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1991.
3. Heberlein, T.A. & Baumgartner, R. Factors affecting response rate to
mailed questionnaires. American Soc. Rev. 43: 451, 1978.
|