Home Members Only Search About Us Store FASEB Member Directory

 the-aps.org>publications>journals>advances>types of articles

advertising
awards
careers and mentoring
chapters
committees
education
meetings
membership
news archives
press room
public affairs
publications
sections and groups
sites of interest
trainees

9560 rockville pike, bethesda, MD 20814-3991
 

 


ARTICLE TYPES: Advances in Physiology Education

Advances publishes several types of peer-reviewed articles. Non-peer-reviewed contributions include short articles submitted to columns and special features or letters expanding on any topic previously published. The length of articles is determined by their content; a pointed, concise style is desirable. The title should be designated to attract readers. For peer-reviewed contributions, an abstract of 170 words or less should make clear the significance of the topic and summarize its key points.

A brief description of the sections of the journal follows.

Peer-reviewed submissions

HOW WE TEACH

These papers are descriptions of strategies for teaching and assessment in which authors state the educational problem addressed and describe the intervention. The project should have explicit pedagogical justification arising from learning theory or published research findings. References to these should be cited.

The paper should include information about the educational context in which the intervention took place, a description of the content, and sufficient detail of how the strategy was implemented to allow readers to duplicate the intervention. Evaluation of the strategy's success is highly desirable. This may include student and teacher perceptions as well as quantitative assessment of the strategy's effects on learning. When appropriate, statistical analysis of quantitative assessment should be included.

Papers addressing the teaching application of technology should include the rationale for using technology to teach a particular topic, detailed information about resources, the educational context in which the activity took place, and sufficient detail of how the technology was used to allow readers to attempt to duplicate the activity. Evaluation of the success of the activity is highly desirable. This may include students' and teachers' perceptions as well as quantitative assessment of the activity's effects on learning. When appropriate, statistical analysis of quantitative assessment should be included.

A new feature in this section will be reviews of teaching software. Readers who would like to submit reviews or descriptions of software they have used are asked to contact the Associate Editor in charge of this section, John Griffin, at jdgri2@wm.edu  before submitting their manuscript to APS Central.

TEACHING IN THE LABORATORY

Peer-reviewed papers in this section usually fall into two categories. "How We Teach in the Laboratory" papers should meet the criteria described above in the "How We Teach" section. "Curriculum and Materials" papers are more descriptive contributions that describe innovative laboratory activities for students and suggestions for constructing or adapting equipment or existing curriculum. These papers should have sufficient detail to allow readers to duplicate the activity. They should include the rationale for the activity, a description of what happens when students engage in the activity, typical results that students would obtain, and qualitative or quantitative assessment of the activity's effect on learning.

HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES

Historical perspectives are scholarly essays pertaining to the history of the discipline and profession of physiology. Also included within this section are the living history profiles of distinguished members selected by the society. 

PERSONAL VIEWS

Personal Views are substantive essays that present philosophical perspectives on physiological education. They must be scholarly but can be provocative, pointed, candid and reflective.

USING CLASSIC PAPERS TO TEACH PHYSIOLOGY

Advances in Physiology Education is soliciting submission of original manuscripts in concert with the APS Legacy Project and its accompanying Essays on APS Classic Papers (http://www.the-aps.org/publications/classics/).

Papers published in this category will describe, in detail, how a classic paper published in an APS journal selected from the Legacy Project (http://www.the-aps.org/publications/legacy/) can be used to teach physiological principles to undergraduate or graduate students. A vital component of this paper is a section entitled “Teaching Points” which clearly outlines how an instructor might use the classic paper in the classroom or laboratory. Also encouraged is the selection of a figure and/or table from the classic paper that, along with a descriptive legend with homework questions, can provide a handout for instructors to distribute to students as a "discovery learning" project. The manuscript should also have a short abstract giving a general description of the overall goal of the submission.

The responding authors should indicate in their cover letter that the submitted manuscript is in response to this call for papers. The manuscript will undergo normal peer review. If published, the article will be highlighted together with others appearing in response to this call.

Since it is vital that each APS classic paper result in only one Advances in Physiology Education manuscript, please contact Associate Editor Hershel Raff, Ph.D. (E-mail: hraff@mcw.edu) if you are interested in preparing a manuscript.

STAYING CURRENT

This section is intended to help readers stay current in physiology and education.  Contributions will consist of short reviews that describe recent advances in and/or new methods in physiology and are expected to highlight important concepts that should be taught to students.  In addition, contributions that review new advances in educational technology or educational pedagogy are encouraged.  When applicable, contributions to this section will include a list of links to content in the teaching archives and other articles of interest.  Papers and abstracts from the annual Refresher Course held at the Experimental Biology meeting will be published in this section.

Contributions to this section may be unsolicited or commissioned by the Editorial Board.  Readers who wish to contribute manuscripts pertaining to one of the above mentioned categories are encouraged to contact the Editor.

Features (usually not peer-reviewed)

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

The editors welcome letters expanding on any topic previously discussed. Comments about articles in Advances may also be posted with the article in the APS Archives of Teaching Resources (http://www.apsarchive.org).

MEETING REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS

This section will include reports from meetings of interest and announcements of upcoming meetings around the world. Readers who know of a meeting that should be included are encouraged to send as much information as possible to the Editor. Announcements must be submitted no later than three months prior to the issue in which the announcement is to appear (i.e., announcements for the June issue must be submitted no later than March 1).

 

Back to Advances Main Page