Contact:
Donna Krupa
Office: (301) 634-7209
Cell: (301) 332-4402
dkrupa@the-aps.org
Chronic Neuropathic “Phantom”
Pain Comes From The Affected Nerve And Spinal Cord
Novel
research points to promising relief target pathway
BETHESDA, MD (June 6, 2006) – By some accounts, chronic
pain affects nearly 100 million Americans from such varied causes as
arthritis, sciatica, cancer, diabetes. Most forms of pain result from
identifiable causes which serve the “good” purpose in warning of a real
physical problem that needs attention, or rest.
Another kind of chronic pain may start with a specific
injury, surgery or disease event, but may linger for weeks or even years
beyond any useful protective function. Such events range from shingles to
open-heart surgery where up to half the patients suffer long-term pain,
breast removal (sometimes even lumpectomies), or – in the most drastic
cases, spinal injury or amputation.
Such “neuropathic pain” is particularly vexing and
difficult to treat because there’s no agreed location or physiological
mechanism to target for therapy. New research from the University of
Alberta, Canada appearing in the Journal of Neurophysiology
reported that the place to look is between the nerves that are producing the
pain and the spine, rather than from the spine to the brain, according to
the senior author, Peter A. Smith.
The paper, “Sciatic chronic constriction injury
produces cell-type specific changes in the electrophysiological properties
of rat substantia gelatinosa neurons,” is in the online Journal of
Neurophysiology, published by The American Physiological Society.
Research was by Sridhar Balasubramanyan, Patrick L. Stemkowski, Martin J.
Stebbing and Peter A. Smith, University of Alberta, Canada; Stebbing
is also at RMIT University, Bundoora, Australia.
Importance of identifying peripheral nerves as key
target
Marshall Devor, a professor at the Institute of Life
Sciences, and at the Center for Research on Pain, Hebrew University,
Jerusalem, said “the results reported in this paper are quite optimistic in
terms of the prospects for finding future methods of treatment. First,” he
said, “because if the problem is in the spine or the brain, it’s hard to
treat. But if the impact is in the nerve, we have a better idea where to
look and it’s also easier to target therapy there.”
Devor added that the Alberta team “didn’t prove that
the central nervous system isn’t involved, but they have shown that the
peripheral nerve probably is highly involved.” Devor wrote an editorial in
the Journal accompanying the Balasubramanyan et al. paper.
Paradoxes abound: role of inflammation, contrary
reactions; Iraq casualties
“The subject gets complicated quickly and is full of
paradoxes,” Smith said: “For instance, in chronic pain there’s often an
emotional element. If a patient has post-traumatic stress syndrome, that
could make the pain worse because there are overlapping disorders.”
The war in Iraq has highlighted the issue of chronic
neuropathic pain in amputations (called “phantom limb pain”) because the
rate of amputations is so high compared to previous wars.
Smith said that another “big issue in chronic pain is
that two people can have more or less identical injuries, and one gets
chronic pain, but the other doesn’t. It may have to do with the immune
system and inflammation,” he said.
Another paradox, he pointed out, is that “most types of
pain are associated with tissue damage and inflammation. Because neuropathic
pain can go on for years after initial inflammation has subsided, it is
defined as ‘noninflammatory pain.’ Although this definition is accurate, it
may have clouded our thinking as to how neuropathic pain is initiated.
Current research suggests that an initial transient inflammatory event may
set the whole long term pain sequence into motion,” he said.
Classic explanation found lacking, though spinal
changes identified
In the current study, researchers constricted the
sciatic nerve of young rats, then studied what changes had occurred in the
substantia gelatinosa. This translucent area of the spinal cord is
involved in the processing of unpleasant sensations that can be perceived as
painful. According to Devor, much has been made of the theory that
neuropathic pain actually “imprints” changes in the spinal column that are
responsible for the long-lived chronic pain.
What Balasubramanyan et al. found, however, didn’t
quite match what they, or others, might have expected. According to their
discussion section: “Given the increase in the excitability of dorsal horn
neurons that follows peripheral nerve injury in vivo, and the
presence of mechanical hypersensitivity (heightened pain responses) in our
experimental animals, the observed changes in the properties of
substantia gelatinosa neurons at first seem relatively modest.” For
example, CCI [chronic constriction injury] did not promote the generation of
spontaneous action potentials in substantia gelatinosa neurons.
They conclude that CCI indeed produced a certain level
of bona fide “centralization” in that it “alters the intrinsic
properties of the dorsal horn by exerting both pre- and postsynaptic effects
on excitatory synaptic transmission and by attenuating inhibitory
transmission.” However, the “relative contribution of intrinsic, peripheral
and descending mechanisms to nerve injury-induced ‘central hypersensitivity’
is yet to be determined.”
New directions in treating pain
In addition to further studies designed to identify
more precisely what changes occur in neuropathic and chronic pain scenarios,
Smith said there is still much to be done in determining how to treat such
pain, whatever the mechanisms.
For instance, it may be most appropriate to target the
initial injury that precipitates the enduring neuropathic pain. In fact,
this is already done by the use of pre-emptive anesthesia during surgery.
The surgeon uses a local anesthetic to deaden the nerves as well as a
general anesthetic to immobilize the patent for surgery. Such procedures
should be encouraged, Smith said. Another possibility may be to suppress the
immune system for the initial five days after injury. This may curtail the
inflammation associated with peripheral nerves that appears to trigger many
aspects of neuropathic pain.
-
According to lead author Sridhar Balasubramanyan:
“Clearly, what needs to be done now is to go back to the periphery and
concentrate on finding what physiological mechanisms might be at work
closer to the removed part or the original injury site, as in cases of
diabetic neuropathy, shingles and surgery.”
-
The whole issue of treating chronic and neuropathic pain
continues to mystify clinicians and researchers, Smith noted. For
instance “opiates work well in almost all cases of regular pain, but
morphine is of limited use in chronic pain.”
A recent article in Psychiatric Times by Steven
A. King reported that while the “apparent neuropathic nature of phantom limb
pain (PLP) would suggest that antidepressants, anticonvulsants and similar
medications would be most efficacious…most (PLP) patients are treated with
acetaminophen, nonsteroidal antiinflammatories and opioids.” A survey
article by M.A. Hanley and associates found that just over half of PLP
patients, and over one-third of severe PLSP patients, “had never been
treated” at all for their pain.
Source and funding
The paper, “Sciatic chronic constriction injury
produces cell-type specific changes in the electrophysiological properties
of rat substantia gelatinosa neurons,” is in the online Journal of
Neurophysiology, published by The American Physiological
Society; it will appear in the July issue. Research was by Sridhar
Balasubramanyan, Patrick L. Stemkowski, Martin J. Stebbing and Peter A.
Smith, Department of Pharmacology and Centre for Neuroscience, University of
Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Stebbing is also at the School of Medical
Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Research supported by the Canadian Institutes for
Health Research, the Christopher Reeve Paralysis Foundation and a
stipend from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (Balasubramanyan).
Editor’s note: The media may obtain a copy of
Balasubramanyan et al. by contacting Donna Krupa, American Physiological
Society, (301) 634-7209, cell (703) 967-2751 or
dkrupa@the-aps.org.
* * *
The
American Physiological Society was founded in 1887 to foster basic and
applied bioscience. The Bethesda, Maryland-based society has more than
10,500 members and publishes 14 peer-reviewed journals containing almost
4,000 articles annually.
APS
provides a wide range of research, educational and career support and
programming to further the contributions of physiology to understanding the
mechanisms of diseased and healthy states. In 2004, APS received
the Presidential Award for Excellence in Science,
Mathematics and Engineering Mentoring (PAESMEM).
# # #