Embryonic Stem Cell Therapy
Shows Steady Benefits In Rebuilding Infarcted Heart
The study, entitled “Stable benefit of embryonic stem
cell therapy in myocardial infarction,” appears in the August 2004 edition
of the American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology,
one of 14 peer-reviewed journals published by the American Physiological
Society.
The investigative team under the direction of Andre
Terzic included Denice M. Hodgson, Atta Behfar, Leonid V. Zingman, Garvan C.
Kane, Carmen Perez-Terzic, Alexey E. Alekseev, and Michel Puceat, all of
the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Departments of Medicine, Molecular
Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine,
Rochester, Minnesota. In addition, Perez-Terzic is at Mayo’s Department of
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Puceat is also at Centre de
Recherches de Biochimie Macromoleculaire, CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Researchers took a murine embryonic stem cell line and
engineered a cell clone to express fluorescent proteins so they could easily
identify the location of the “newly” generated cardiac cells. They tested
the cardiogenic capacity of the line and collected cells with high potential
for becoming cardiomyocytes. Randomly assigned rats that had been induced
with myocardial infarction were injected directly into the damaged heart
area either with the embryonic stem cells or were subject to a control or
“sham” protocol.
Three weeks after therapy, the cardiac contractile
function of both groups was tested by echocardiography. Not only was the
stem cell-treated group’s left ventricular pumping significantly stronger
than the sham-treated group, but the heart beat of the stem-cell group
reacted favorably to “stress test,” whereas the sham group showed no
significant response at all.
Like all the other parameters, these improvements were
maintained over the three-month length of the study.
On pathology, further investigation showed the extent
of the positive influence of the stem-cell therapy. First, cardiac cells
stayed in the heart, and didn’t spread to the brain, kidney or liver.
Microscopy showed that the stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes took on the
distinctive striations indicating proper development of contractile
apparatus. Stem cell-treated hearts also showed normal cardiac
ultrastructure, in contrast to acellular infarct areas of sham-treated
hearts.
Finally, the stem cell-treated hearts showed that the
wall or muscle had been “rebuilt” compared with the sham-treated hearts
which remained “eaten-up”, with a decayed thin look, including formation of
aneurysms, associated with a post-heart-attack liability to rupture.
Conversely, the stem cell-treated hearts showed no evidence of graft
rejection, electrical and/or structural abnormality, sudden cardiac death or
tumor formation.
Conclusion and next steps
Going a step
further, they add that “the stable benefit of embryonic stem cell therapy on
myocardial structure and function in this experimental model supports the
potential for stem cell-based reparative treatment of myocardial infarction.
By regenerating diseased myocardium and promoting cardiac repair, embryonic
stem cells provide a unique therapeutic modality that has the potential to
reduce the morbidity and mortality of this prevalent heart disease.”
Looking ahead,
they noted that issues to be resolved include mechanisms of action, finding
the optimum window for therapy, and determining what the long-term effect of
such therapy will be.
Source and
funding: The article, “Stable benefit of embryonic stem cell therapy in
myocardial infarction,” appears in the August 2004 edition of the
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, one
of 14 peer-reviewed journals published by the American Physiological
Society.
This study was
supported by National Institutes of Health, the American Heart
Association, Marriott Foundation, Miami Heart Research Institute,
Mayo-Dubai Healthcare City Research Project, Mayo Clinic CR20
Program, and Association Francaise Contre les Myopathies and
Fondation de France.
Editors’
note: A copy of this research paper is available to the media. Members
of the media are encouraged to obtain an electronic version and to interview
members of the research team. To do so, please contact Donna Krupa at APS
(301) 634-7209, cell (703) 967-2751 or
dkrupa@the-aps.org.
The
American Physiological Society was founded in 1887 to foster basic and
applied bioscience. The Bethesda, Maryland-based society has more than
10,000 members and publishes 14 peer-reviewed journals containing almost
4,000 articles annually.
APS
provides a wide range of research, educational and career support and
programming to further the contributions of physiology to understanding the
mechanisms of diseased and healthy states. In May, APS received the
Presidential Award for Excellence in Science, Mathematics and Engineering
Mentoring (PAESMEM).
# # #