“Man’s Best Friend” May Be Even Better
The erstwhile companion – the beagle dog – proves to be
an effective companion in the study of human allergies
(June 12 , 2003)
Bethesda, MD
– For millions of Americans, allergic rhinitis, or “hayfever” can lead to
severe discomfort, including nasal congestion, difficulty in nasal
breathing, and an increase risk for asthma. People with adverse reactions
to airborne allergens are often hypersensitive to other irritants such as
nitrites, sulfur oxides, airborne particles, and ammonia and co-exposure to
air pollutants and allergens may trigger a synergistic response.
Researchers have believed that although histamine and
amine compounds released by the cells during an allergic reaction contribute
to allergic discomfort, other mediators and neural pathways are also
involved. Ideally, identifying the various levels of irritant- and
allergen-induced reactions in the nasal passages would provide new insights.
To do so, a suitable testing model is necessary to delineate novel target
sites and to test potential efficacy and toxicity of new chemical entities
before starting evaluations in humans.
Unfortunately, finding the animal model has been a lot
more difficult than one would think. Several animal models of rhinitis have
been used in previous research but the results were based on euthanizing the
animals following the techniques tested, an action unsuitable for
application to humans.
A New Study
Now, however, a team of researchers has found that the
erstwhile companion of millions -- the friendly beagle dog -- closely
resembles the pathophysiology for human allergic rhinitis. This discovery
enables the use of experimental techniques similar to those used for the
assessment of human nasal passages and permits other, related experiments.
The authors of “Canine Model of Nasal Congestion and
Allergic Rhinitis” are Ruslan L. Tiniakov, Olga P. Tiniakova, and Donovan B.
Yeates, from the University of
Illinois at Chicago, and Veterans Affairs Chicago Health Care System,
Chicago, IL; and Robbie L. McLeod and John A. Hey, at the Schering-Plough
Research Institute, Kenilworth, NJ. Their findings appear in the May 2003
edition of the Journal of Applied Physiology.
Methodology
Beagles, sensitized to ragweed allergen at birth, were
subjected to inhalation of the ragweed extract into the lower respiratory
tract inducing a systemic anaphylactic response that manifested in
bronchoconstriction, alteration of a breathing pattern, increase in
bronchial mucociliary clearance, and temporary cardiovascular depression.
The researchers believed that, in these dogs, exclusive exposure of the
upper respiratory tract to the same ragweed allergen would precipitate the
development of allergic rhinitis that was responsive to treatment with
a-adrenergic agonists.
To test this hypothesis, they evaluated the degree of
nasal congestion induced by ragweed and histamine in cohorts of
ragweed-sensitized, sham-sensitized, and nonsensitized dogs. Nasal
congestion was assessed by the measurement of the resistance to conducting
air, i.e., nasal airway resistance (RNA)
and the relative cross-sectional areas and the volume of nasal passages.
Three series of experiments were conducted on subgroups
selected from 14 adult beagle dogs of both sexes, weighing 9.5–14.5 kg. Five
dogs were neonatally sensitized to ragweed, three were their sham-sensitized
littermates, and six dogs were nonsensitized. Newborn dogs were sensitized
with intraperitoneal injections containing ragweed extract in a saline mix
and aluminum hydroxide within 24 hours of birth. Injections were repeated
weekly for six weeks and biweekly until 16 weeks of age. In the
sham-sensitized animals, only the aluminum hydroxide in saline was injected.
Five-milliliter samples of venous blood were drawn from each dog beginning
at four months of age and thereafter four times per year to measure serum
ragweed-specific IgE levels.
These sensitization and sham sensitization procedures
were conducted in November 1992 (two dogs), July 1993 (three dogs), and
December 1993 to January 1994 (three dogs). The ragweed-sensitized dogs
previously exhibited an anaphylactic reaction on inhalation of ragweed
extract, whereas their sham-sensitized littermates did not. (Editor’s note:
The research started in the early 1990s, but because it is a longitudinal
study, these are the first significant results.)
The first series of experiments was designed to show,
using a new method of anterior constant-flow nasal rhinomanometry, that a
mediator of allergen-induced rhinitis, histamine, induced nasal congestion
that was alleviated by the local administration of an α-adrenergic agonist.
The second series of experiments was designed to determine, by using the
researchers’ method for RNA measurement in combination with
acoustic rhinometry, whether any ragweed-induced nasal congestion in
ragweed-sensitized, sham-sensitized, and nonsensitized dogs was
immunologically induced and whether these responses were reversible by
topically administered D-pseudoephedrine. The third series of experiments
was designed to demonstrate the utility of this model in estimation of
decongestive activity of orally administered α-adrenoceptor agonist, D-pseudoephedrine.
The volume of nasal airways was assessed by acoustic
rhinometry and resistance to airflow (RNA) by anterior
rhinomanometry.
Results
In the first series of experiments, histamine delivered
to the nasal passages of five dogs caused rapid increase in RNA
from 0.75 + 0.26 to a maximum of 3.56 + 0.50 cmH2O·l-1·minutes
within the first five minutes. The RNA in these dogs remained
above the baseline for the next 40 minutes. The histamine-induced increase
in RNA was almost completely reversed by the administration of
aerosolized 0.1 percent phenylephrine to the nasal passages. The responses
to histamine and phenylephrine in both the left and right nasal passages
were similar. In the second series of experiments, administration of the
ragweed extract into the nasal passages of five ragweed-sensitized dogs
caused RNA to increase over a period of 20 minutes from 0.25 +
0.01 to a maximum of 1.98 + 0.84 cmH2O·l-1·minutes.
Administration of aerosolized saline to these dogs caused a further increase
in RNA. In the third series of experiments, 30–40 minutes after
the intranasal delivery of aerosolized ragweed extract, signs of severe
nasal congestion were observed in four of five sensitized dogs that received
placebo 30 minutes before the ragweed challenge.
The nasal passages of ragweed-sensitized dogs
demonstrated clear signs of hyperreactivity to the ragweed allergen,
resulting in the development of severe nasal congestion. This nasal
congestion was evidenced by the characteristic changes in RNA and
nasal luminal geometry. In sensitized dogs, nasal congestion appeared to be
immunologically precipitated because it was never observed in nonsensitized
dogs challenged with the same ragweed allergen. Local vasodilatation and
consequent mucosal edema play key roles in development of the observed nasal
congestion given that both the histamine-induced congestion in nonsensitized
dogs and the ragweed-induced changes in sensitized dogs were susceptible to
the treatment with α-adrenomimetics.
Conclusions
The measurement of RNA using a modification
of anterior constant-flow rhinomanometry appears to be a simple, practical,
and sensitive method for assessment of nasal airway patency. The method is
relatively noninvasive and allows multiple experiments in the same cohort of
dogs and provides more detailed information about the present condition of
nasal passages. The model here of allergic rhinitis described is relevant to
human disease and can be successfully used in the identification of novel
therapeutic target sites and the pharmacological screening of newly
developed topically or systemically administered antiallergic drugs.
Source: May 2003 edition of the Journal of Applied Physiology
- end -
The American Physiological
Society (APS) was founded in 1887 to foster basic and applied science, much
of it relating to human health. The Bethesda, MD-based Society has more than
10,000 members and publishes 3,800 articles in its 14 peer-reviewed journals
every year.
***
Editor’s Note: A copy of the research article is
available in pdf format to the press.
Members of the press are invited to obtain a pdf copy
of the study and to interview members of the research team. To do so, please
contact Donna Krupa at 703.527.7357 (direct dial), 703.967.2751 (cell) or
djkrupa1@aol.com.