Lazy Snakes...Pythons Can Be Couch Potatoes, Too
Consumption of certain food
types cause the constricting reptile to expend excessive energy in digestion
San Diego, Calif.
– Comic strip genius Gary Larson, creator of “The Far Side,” is noted for
morphing animal scientific attributes into human behavior. Consider the
sketch of a family of pythons laying about after Thanksgiving dinner. The
snakes that consumed a mouse, some chicken, and glucose are ready to go out
and play football shortly after dining. But the pythons that indulged on the
starchy foods cannot budge from the couch, still trying to digest their
meal.
A scene from a Larson cartoon? Perhaps. But it
is also a notion based in scientific fact.
A team of California researchers have tested
pythons, determining that the reptiles’ specific dynamic action (SDA),
or the metabolic increment associated with a python’s digestion,
assimilation, and excretion of specific foods. SDA is determined not by how
much it eats, but what it eats. Moreover, the energy required for a certain
level of SDA accounts for a large energy expenditure which may reduce the
metabolic scope available for other activities.
The authors of these findings will discuss their results in a
presentation entitled, “Effects Of Meal Type On
Postprandial Calorigenesis In Python Molurus.” The investigators are
M.D. McCue, A.F. Bennett, and J.W. Hicks, all of
the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology, University of California, Irvine. They will appear during
the upcoming scientific conference, “The Power of Comparative Physiology:
Evolution, Integration and Application” an American Physiological Society
intersociety meeting being held August 24-28, 2002, at the Town & Country
Hotel, San Diego, CA. Further information about the conference and the
speakers can be found at:
http://www.the-aps.org/meetings/aps/san_diego/home.htm
Methodology
Hatchling Burmese pythons
were obtained and
raised in the laboratory on a diet of mice and rats for four months prior to
experiments. The pythons were then fed various 500 and 250 kJ meals
(protein, carbohydrate, lipid) using rigid acrylic feeding tubes. Protein
meals consisted of lean chicken breast meat, casein, collagen, and gelatin.
Carbohydrate meals included two complex (wheat starch, cellulose) and two
simple carbohydrates (D-glucose, sucrose). Lipid meals consisted of lard and
beef suet. Slurries were created with dehydrated chemicals by adding water
until a consistency similar to maple syrup was achieved. Meal volumes were
not controlled and varied and feeding treatments were randomly assigned to
each individual python.
Following experimental feedings, snakes were
placed inside metabolic chambers and oxygen consumption was measured over a
62-96 hour period, using flow-through respirometry. Trials where snakes
regurgitated meals during metabolic measurements were excluded from the
study. Snakes were given an experimental feeding every 14-21 days. Between
experimental feedings, snakes were allowed to voluntarily consume one mouse
or rat.
The post feeding metabolic responses for each of the 11 experimental
meals were combined and compared with their standard metabolic rate.
Results
The key findings from this experiment were:
-
Mean masses of eight pythons before and after experiment did
not change significantly.
-
All meals had heats of combustion
of 500 kJ except for simple carbohydrates, which were found to be lethal
to these snakes at 500 kJ.
-
Mouse, chicken, casein, collagen,
glucose, and sucrose meals induced an SDA response; gelatin, suet, lard,
cellulose, and starch did not induce SDA.
-
SDA responses induced by meals
with the largest and smallest volumes were not statistically different;
intermediate meals induced the greatest SDA.
-
Gelatin appeared to be
assimilated but is not cause a significant SDA response
-
Collagen caused an SDA response;
however it was always completely regurgitated several days following
ingestion.
-
Protein meals that induced the
greatest SDA (casein, mouse, and chicken breast) were also those highest
in essential amino acids.
Conclusions
The results revealed that single and dual element sugars caused the
pythons’ metabolic rate to increase two-fold, however complex carbohydrates
were unable to elicit a significant metabolic response, and were not
assimilated by the snakes. Protein meals caused variable SDA responses that
appeared to be related to the amino acid composition of the specific meals.
Casein caused a four-fold increase in metabolism, while gelatin caused no
detectible changes and was not assimilated. Various lipid meals did not
cause any significant change in oxygen consumption and were generally not
assimilated. The findings suggest that a large serving of one particular
type of food does probably not trigger the large SDA increment well known in
this species. The researchers’ next steps are to investigate SDA induced by
specific amino acids and amino acid mixtures and digestive assimilation
efficiency of meals that induce SDA.
Essentially, pythons are governed by
physiological principles that encourage consumption of specific foods, to
optimize their metabolic rate, and allow energy expenditure for activities
other than digestion.
-end-
The American Physiological
Society (APS) is one of the world’s most prestigious organizations for
physiological scientists. These researchers specialize in understanding the
processes and functions by which animals live, and thus ultimately underlie
human health and disease. Founded in 1887 the Bethesda, MD-based Society
has more than 10,000 members and publishes 3,800 articles in its 14
peer-reviewed journals each year.